top of page

Why Do We Keep Repeating the Same Patterns with the People We Love : Understanding Attachment Patterns in Relationships

2 days ago
9 min read
Red spider lilies in bloom with Mount Fuji in the background under a clear autumn sky


“This time, I’m not going to fall into the same pattern again.”


And yet, somehow, we find ourselves hurt by something strangely familiar.


A small change in someone’s behaviour makes us anxious.

We want to feel close to them, but struggle to put our feelings into words and find ourselves pulling away instead.

Or, when it seems as though they might be distancing themselves, we feel an almost irresistible need to check that the relationship is still all right.


The person may be different.

The circumstances may be different.


So why do similar feelings and reactions keep appearing in our relationships?


One way of understanding this is through attachment patterns in relationships.


At Locus of Life, I have written before about different attachment styles, including anxious, avoidant, secure and disorganised attachment. But understanding attachment is about more than working out which “type” you are.


When we look a little more closely, different questions begin to emerge:


Why does this particular situation make me so anxious?

Why do I want closeness and, at the same time, feel an urge to pull away?

Why do I keep reacting in the same way, even when part of me knows what is happening?


These questions take us beyond labels and towards the psychological processes underneath them.


Rather than thinking of attachment styles simply as categories that divide people into different types, it can be more helpful to explore how we anticipate relationships, how we interpret what happens within them, and how our minds try to protect us when a relationship feels uncertain.



Attachment patterns in relationships are more than just a “type”


The language of attachment styles has become increasingly familiar.


“I’m anxious, so of course I worry about how they feel about me.”

“I’m avoidant, so I need distance.”


Recognising ourselves in these descriptions can be a useful starting point. But there is more to attachment than placing ourselves in one category.


One way of understanding adult attachment is to think in terms of two dimensions: attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance.


Rather than treating them as fixed boxes, we can consider the extent to which each tendency may be present.


In other words, you do not have to define your whole self as:


“I’m an anxious person.”

or:

“I’m an avoidant person.”


A more useful question may be:


When connection feels uncertain, which way does my mind tend to move?


To understand why those reactions can feel so automatic, it helps to look at a concept from attachment theory known as the internal working model.



We are not only responding to the person in front of us


In attachment theory, an internal working model refers, broadly speaking, to the expectations about ourselves and other people that develop through our experiences of relationships.


It may sound rather technical, but at its simplest, it is something like an underlying sense that:


“This is probably how relationships work.”


For some people, that may include expectations such as:


“If I need someone, it is safe to turn to them.”

“I can talk about how I feel without the relationship falling apart.”


For others, the expectations may sound more like:


“People can leave at any time.”

“If I show vulnerability, I might get hurt.”

“If I expect too much from people, I’ll only be disappointed. It’s better to manage on my own.”


We do not necessarily walk around consciously thinking these things.


Often, they become more noticeable when something in an important relationship feels uncertain.


And internal working models are not simply beliefs about relationships. They may also influence what we notice, how we interpret another person’s behaviour, and what we do next.



How our expectations shape what we see


Imagine that someone close to you is quieter than usual.


The only thing you know for certain may be:


“They haven’t said very much today.”


But what that silence comes to mean can be very different from one person to another.


“They’re probably tired.”

“Are they angry about something?”

“Have I done something wrong?”


Or perhaps:


“They’re going to ask me about something again.”

“This is going to turn into a difficult conversation. I’d rather keep some distance.”


If we separate these out, we can begin to see a distinction between:


what has actually happened

and

the meaning our mind has given to what happened.


Of course, sometimes the other person really is angry.

Sometimes there genuinely is a problem in the relationship.


The point is not to explain every difficult interaction as “just attachment”.


But neither do we encounter each situation with a completely blank slate.


We make sense of what is happening now partly through expectations shaped by what relationships have taught us before.



When old expectations seem to confirm themselves


There is another important part of this process.


The expectations we carry do not only affect how we interpret another person’s behaviour.


They can also influence how we respond to them.


Suppose, somewhere inside, there is an expectation that:


“People I love eventually leave.”


Something about the other person seems slightly different.


You feel anxious.

You become more alert to their expressions, their tone of voice, the way they respond to you.

Wanting reassurance, you repeatedly check how they feel about you or whether everything between you is all right.


The other person may begin to feel under pressure and take a little more space.


And when they do, the original expectation can suddenly seem even more convincing:


“I knew it. They’re pulling away.”


The opposite pattern can happen too.


Perhaps the expectation is:


“There’s no point relying on anyone.”

When something is difficult, you do not mention it.

You try to cope on your own.

To the people around you, you may appear perfectly able to manage.


They may therefore have no idea that you need support.


And the experience can end up reinforcing the original expectation:


“See? No one is there when I need them.”


This does not mean that we “create our own problems”.

Nor does it mean that we are responsible for another person’s behaviour.


It means that in relationships, we may respond to another person through expectations we have developed over time, and our response can then become part of what happens between us.


Much of this can take place without a deliberate choice.


In this way, familiar reactions may repeat themselves before we have fully noticed what is happening.



When attachment is trying to protect us


It can be helpful here to look at anxious and avoidant attachment from a slightly different angle.


Attachment research sometimes describes two broad directions our responses may take when a relationship does not feel secure: hyperactivation and deactivation.


Hyperactivation involves attachment-related feelings and behaviours becoming stronger when connection seems under threat.


We may become highly sensitive to another person’s responses.

We may spend a great deal of time wondering what they think of us.

We may look for reassurance.


Even a small amount of distance can feel deeply unsettling.


Rather than seeing this simply as “being too worried”, we might understand something underneath it as:


“I need to move closer so that I don’t lose this connection.”


Deactivation moves in the other direction.


If expecting something from another person might lead to hurt, perhaps it feels safer not to expect it.

If relying on someone has not felt dependable, perhaps managing alone feels safer.

If emotions are becoming overwhelming, perhaps creating some distance feels easier.


Underneath this response may be something like:


“I need to quieten my need for connection in order to protect myself.”


On the surface, these responses can look like opposites.


One moves towards connection; the other moves away from it.


But when we look beneath the behaviour, both can be understood as ways in which the mind tries to protect itself from the anxiety or hurt that can arise in relationships.


Rather than thinking only in terms of “anxious people” and “avoidant people”, we can begin to ask:


When a relationship no longer feels secure, how does my mind try to regain a sense of balance?


That question can open up a rather different way of understanding attachment.



When strong emotions make another person’s mind harder to see


Another useful idea when thinking about attachment is mentalising, sometimes discussed under the broader concept of mentalisation.


Mentalising is our capacity to imagine the thoughts, feelings, intentions and wishes that might lie behind our own behaviour and the behaviour of other people.


It is not about correctly “reading” someone’s mind.


In fact, an important part of mentalising is being able to hold on to the possibility that:


“I cannot know another person’s mind completely.”


When anxiety or fear becomes intense in an important relationship, however, that uncertainty can become much harder to tolerate.


Someone becomes quiet.


Instead of:


“Perhaps something is on their mind,”


we experience:


“They’re angry with me.”


Someone says:


“I need a little time to think on my own.”


Instead of:


“Perhaps they need some time to themselves,”


we hear:


“They’re trying to leave me.”


Or someone asks:


“Can you tell me how you’re feeling?”


Instead of:


“Perhaps they’re trying to understand me,”


it can feel like:


“They’re criticising me.”


In those moments, our interpretation can begin to feel as though it is simply the truth about what the other person is thinking.


If we are able to pause and wonder,


“When I think, ‘This is what they must be feeling’, do I actually know that? Or is this the meaning my own mind is making of the situation?”


a little space can begin to open up.


That space is not about dismissing our feelings.

Nor is it about telling ourselves that we “shouldn’t” think or feel a certain way.


It is simply space to recognise that:


what I imagine another person is feeling and what they are actually feeling may not be the same thing.



Why familiar patterns can feel stronger with the people who matter most


Someone may be thoughtful and composed in many areas of life, yet feel like a different version of themselves in a close relationship.


At work, they may be able to discuss problems calmly, but with a partner their emotions become much stronger.

Something that would barely register with a friend may feel deeply painful when it comes from someone they love.


This does not necessarily mean that they are “bad at managing emotions”.


The more important a relationship is to us, the more it can matter when that connection feels threatened.


And the more threatened it feels, the more readily familiar ways of protecting ourselves may come into play.


As we have seen, those reactions can also shape the interaction with the other person, drawing us back towards familiar relationship patterns.


But having a pattern does not mean that the pattern can never change.



Understanding the past does not mean being defined by it


Learning about attachment can sometimes lead to the thought:


“So that’s why I turned out this way.”


Looking back at earlier experiences can certainly help us understand ourselves.


But the purpose of understanding attachment is not to identify someone to blame, nor is it to explain everything about the present through the past.


Adult attachment is not completely fixed.


Later relationships and experiences can also shape how we experience closeness, trust and dependence.


That does not mean erasing the past.


Someone who has come to expect that there is no point relying on others may have an experience of asking for help and discovering that the relationship remains intact.

Someone who expects honesty to lead to rejection may speak openly about how they feel and find that they are still accepted.

Someone who fears that distance means abandonment may gradually experience that two people can have space between them without the relationship disappearing.


As experiences like these accumulate, another possibility can slowly find a place alongside what we already know:


“Perhaps relationships do not always have to work in the way I have come to expect.”


This is not about removing everything we have learnt and becoming a completely different person.


It is about new relational experiences being added to what is already there, gradually making different ways of interpreting and responding possible.



From “What attachment style am I?” to “What is happening inside me?”


Learning about attachment styles can sometimes make our past experiences feel as though they finally make sense.


“I’m anxious. That explains it.”

“I’m avoidant. That’s why I do this.”


And that can certainly be one way into understanding ourselves.


But when we look beyond the label, we may begin to notice something else:


the movements of our own mind that a category alone cannot fully explain.


When you notice yourself becoming strongly affected in an important relationship, you might gently wonder:


What am I afraid of right now?

What meaning have I given to what has just happened?

Am I seeing this person as they are in this moment, or am I also seeing them through expectations I already carry?

And what am I trying to protect right now?


Understanding your attachment style is not about giving yourself another label.


It can be one way of becoming more aware of the emotional processes that may have been repeating outside your awareness.


And as those processes become easier to notice, other ways of responding may gradually become easier to see too.



🌿 A Space to Notice What Happens Inside


You may have a sense that certain reactions keep repeating, yet still find it difficult to know where to begin when you try to understand them on your own.


“Nothing is seriously wrong.”

“I’m not even sure whether this is about the relationship or about me.”


You can bring those uncertainties into counselling too.


At Locus of Life, you do not need to arrive with a clear explanation of what the problem is, or already know what the answer should be.


Counselling can be a space to notice what happens inside when a relationship feels uncertain:


what you feel,

what you begin to expect,

and how you find yourself seeing the other person in those moments.


By putting feelings into words before they are fully sorted out, there can be time to look more closely at your own emotional patterns, without pressure to reach a particular conclusion.


[🔽 Book your free 30-minute online session here]


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page